Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commissions or revenue on some articles through the links below.
A difference in financial philosophy has put a couple at odds.
One spouse sees a reverse mortgage as a predatory “scam,” while the other, a retired CFO, sees it as a tool to unlock $100,000 in cash for home improvements and a more comfortable lifestyle, as detailed in a Reddit post.
A reverse mortgage is a home loan for homeowners age 62 or older. It allows homeowners to borrow money without making mortgage payments. The balance is paid when the borrower dies, sells the home or moves, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Don’t miss:
The disagreement highlights a common consumer protection concern surrounding reverse mortgages, particularly regarding cost transparency, risk to home equity and the legally mandated accounting process.
“My husband is absorbed and is pushing hard to get it done,” she wrote.
The couple, both 72, are in a secure financial situation, having just sold their previous home and planning to pay cash for a new, upper-middle-class construction home.
They also report that they have “very good Social Security income” and an extensive 401-(k) plan and other liquid assets, even more than the proposed loan amount.
The husband’s motivation is to access extra money for improvements and a slight increase in his standard of living, moving away from a “frugal” approach. It cited upfront fees of $7,000, although the interest rate remains undisclosed.
Trend: Historically, the Arrived Home Private Credit Fund has paid an annualized dividend yield of 8.1%*, providing access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum.
The wife’s apprehension stems from a common concern regarding reverse mortgages: the potential for the line to “eat up equity” and the predatory terms that could lead to a cheap, forced sale of the home.
“I can’t help but imagine a lien eating up the equity, with terms that could force the instant sale of the house for a ridiculously low amount to build the reward,” he wrote.
Despite her solid financial habits, she is haunted by anecdotes of people who lost their homes as a result of unforeseen events such as medical problems or the death of a spouse, which can trigger a mandatory payment event.