ORLANDO, FLORIDA– A federal judge in Florida is pushing for a decision in a case A lawsuit over whether Detained at the Florida Everglades Immigration Center known as “Crocodile Alcatraz” They get adequate access to lawyers.
U.S. District Judge Sherri Polster Chappell on Friday ordered a two-day conference to be held next month in her courtroom in Fort Myers, with attorneys with settlement authority present. The judge requested an update at a hearing next Monday.
“The court will not accept excuses regarding early departures for flights or other meetings,” the judge wrote of next month’s conference.
The detainees’ lawsuit against the federal and state governments over legal access is one of three federal cases challenging practices at an immigration detention center built this summer on a remote airstrip in the Florida Everglades by the administration of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.
In a separate environmental lawsuit, a federal appeals court panel in September allowed the center to continue operating by suspending a lower court’s initial order ordering the facility To calm down By the end of October. The appeal was put on hold during the government shutdown but resumed last week.
A third claim It claims that immigration is a federal issue and that Florida agencies and private contractors hired by the state do not have the authority to operate the facility.
President Donald Trump toured the facility in July and He suggested that it could be a model for future detentions across the country as his administration seeks to expand the infrastructure needed to increase deportations. While the facility was built and operated by the state and its private contractors, federal officials agreed to compensate Florida For $608 million.
In the legal access case, attorneys representing detainees at the Everglades facility are seeking a preliminary injunction to make it easier for their clients to meet and communicate with their attorneys.
They claim that detainees’ lawyers must schedule a visit three days in advance, unlike other detention centers where lawyers can only attend during visiting hours; that detainees are often transferred to other facilities after their lawyer schedules an appointment to see them; The delay in scheduling appointments was so long that detainees were unable to meet with lawyers before key deadlines.
Florida officials, in proposing to dismiss the case, said it was now moot since concerns initially raised by detainees and their attorneys had been addressed. They added that any delay was due to an attempt to build a facility for thousands of detainees in a remote area with little infrastructure.
“In other words, there is no longer a live controversy,” Florida officials said in their court filing.
___
Follow Mike Schneider on the Bluesky social media platform: @mikeysid.bsky.social.