You probably shouldn’t wait until age 70 to claim Social Security. Here’s eye-opening math (but no one likes to show it)

You probably shouldn’t wait until age 70 to claim Social Security. Here’s eye-opening math (but no one likes to show it)
You probably shouldn’t wait until age 70 to claim Social Security. Here’s eye-opening math (but no one likes to show it)

On paper, it seems pretty obvious that the best way to optimize your retirement is to delay claiming Social Security for as long as possible.

According to the Social Security Administration, receiving your benefits as early as possible (age 62 for those born after 1960) could result in lower monthly payments. At age 67, you qualify for full benefits, but if you delay your claim until age 70, you could enjoy a full 24% increase in monthly benefits. At age 70 your monthly benefit stops increasing.

With this in mind, many financial planners recommend delaying claims for benefits as long as possible until age 70. However, this relatively simple math overlooks some key variables that might surprise some retirement planners.

“Age 70 is not the most financially rewarding age to start benefits unless a person has a low discount rate and/or is confident they will live several years beyond their life expectancy,” says an article published in the Journal of Financial Planning by two financial experts. (1) The discount rate is the expected average rate of return that tells us the present value of future payments. It is used to decide if it is worth waiting for Social Security.

They said their calculations “do not support the presumption that the vast majority of people who choose to begin receiving their Social Security retirement benefits before age 70 are making a mistake.”

Here’s the updated math that some academics are using to suggest that early retirement might be a better option for some.

While they recommend delayed benefits, academics and economists use simple, generalized assumptions that do not fully reflect the reality of most retirees. So says Derek Tharp, financial advisor and associate professor of finance at the University of Southern Maine.

In an article published in The Wall Street Journal, Tharp argues that this simple spreadsheet calculation assumes that “future dollars are worth about the same as today’s dollars” (2). This assumption is based on another assumption: that a retiree invests primarily in ultra-safe assets that earn little or no return after inflation.

In doing so, economists have missed the opportunity cost, which is the return on the forgone option.

Source link