Michael Burry says Palantir is only worth $46. Here’s why you’re wrong

Michael Burry says Palantir is only worth . Here’s why you’re wrong
Michael Burry says Palantir is only worth . Here’s why you’re wrong

Michael Burry, the renowned investor who predicted the 2008 housing crisis in The big shorthas once again adopted a contrary stance. In his recent Substack post, “Palantir’s New Clothes,” the founder of the now-defunct Scion Asset Management argues that Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is wildly overvalued, comparing its AI platform to a naked emperor.

He cites rising accounts receivable, huge dilution, unreliable third-party AI models, and a business model that looks more like low-margin consulting than scalable software. Burry pegs the fair value of the shares at just $46, implying a drop of approximately 65% ​​from current levels of around $131. While some of your concerns about valuation risks and execution in a crowded AI space are valid, you are also very wrong.

bar chart.com

Palantir Technologies, headquartered in Denver, Colorado, creates powerful data integration and analytics platforms that help organizations—primarily governments, militaries, and large enterprises—make sense of vast, complex data sets in real time. Its core offerings include Gotham for defense and intelligence, Foundry for commercial operations, and the new Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), which combines secure AI orchestration over enterprise data. These tools power everything from counterterrorism to factory optimization, combining human knowledge with machine-scale analysis.

In 2026, PLTR stock has fallen 26% year-to-date (YTD), a sharp pullback from its 135% rise in 2025. In contrast, the S&P 500 ($SPX) has been essentially flat, with a negligible 0.14% decline over the same period. With a market cap of $313 billion, the stock trades at a P/E of 219x, well above the software industry’s typical 30-50x, reflecting its history of lack of profitability until recent quarters. The forward P/E stands at 123x, still premium but more digestible given the expected earnings growth. The sales price is high at 69 times, compared to historical averages for high-growth SaaS companies in the range of 10 to 20 times during expansion phases.

These metrics argue in favor of Burry’s thesis that Palantir is “expensive” by traditional measures, but they underscore the AI ​​stock’s transition: Once a cash-burning startup, it’s now generating software-like margins as revenue grows. In reality, the stock isn’t undervalued at all, but calling it overvalued ignores the ongoing earnings inflection: It’s trading at a price that values ​​continued hypergrowth rather than the past.

Source link