Washington — A roughly $70 billion bill to fund immigration enforcement during the remainder of President Donald Trump’s term was supposed to be an easy boost for Republicans.
but Progress stopped Because of concerns about the inclusion of funding for White House security halls in the package and the establishment of A $1.8 billion fund To fund government abuse claims. The stumble not only delayed action on a top GOP priority, but also raised questions about other parts of the party’s legislative agenda, including whether Republicans could enact another party-line sweeping bill referred to in Washington parlance as “Reconciliation 3.0.”
Republicans have spent recent weeks laying the groundwork for such a law, which they hope will serve as a final pitch to voters before the midterm elections.
Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise, both of Louisiana, are meeting with committee and caucus chairs to vet proposals that have strong support from the grassroots. They aim to follow up on last summer’s big hit Tax and spending cuts bill With a measure that would increase Pentagon spending by hundreds of billions of dollars, and would include cuts in other areas to help pay for it, which they portray as a treatment… Government waste and fraud.
It’s a high-risk maneuver in an election year. Success will reinforce the Republican Party’s message of ability to achieve legislative priorities. The failure will highlight some Republican defections in the Trump era that may leave voters searching for an alternative.
Here’s a look at the upcoming debate as Republicans hope to pass the bill before they leave for the August recess.
Johnson overcame the narrow Republican Party majority in the House of Representatives to pass Trump’s tax and spending cuts bill last summer. Vote It was 218-214. At that time, Republicans could afford to lose three votes from within their own ranks. They only lost two.
They will have a small margin of error again, but Johnson said he is more confident of success this time.
“It will be just as beautiful, but not as big, so it will have less props and less stuff to get everyone to agree to,” he said.
Rep. Jody Arrington, chairman of the House Budget Committee, said Republicans are just as enthusiastic as they were last year about the tax cuts bill.
“I believe with this project you will have funds to support our forces in conflict,” said Arrington, of Texas. “I cannot imagine a Republican who would not want to support our troops and our military community in a time of conflict.”
The Trump administration has called on Republicans to provide this $350 billion for defense Through the reconciliation bill.
But Rep. Brendan Boyle, the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said Republicans will have a tougher road ahead than they did with Trump’s big tax-cutting and spending bill.
“I think it would be for two reasons,” said Boyle, R-Pa. “One is the president’s approval rating. It was at a much higher level a year ago than it is now.” “No. 2, we’re much closer to the midterm elections in November. So, if you’re one of the dozen or a few dozen House Republicans who are really vulnerable in a swing district, you should think more carefully about voting for something that includes more cuts to health care.”
The tax cut bill passed last summer cut Medicaid spending by more than $900 billion over a decade. It also reduced food aid spending by about $187 billion over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune described the third reconciliation bill to circumvent the filibuster as a “possible option,” which does not represent much support.
“We haven’t made any commitments on that, but we hear people,” said Thune, of South Dakota.
Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said lawmakers should know what the bill will include before the legislative process begins. This way, it will be less likely to break apart.
“If it becomes just another exercise where you’re not really sure what the end product is going to be, then I think it’s a mistake to even pursue that,” Tillis said. “We have to be smart about it if we do a third, but it’s kind of a success.”
Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she was concerned about the strategy.
She said: “A third reconciliation may or may not happen. I’m just being honest.”
The House of Representatives is expected to meet for another 24 days before it begins its August recess. This leaves little time to pass the budget outline in both chambers, the first hurdle to pursuing partisan tax and spending bills. Committees will also have to finish their work to develop their parts of the legislation.
Another hurdle could be Trump’s treatment of sitting senators whose votes he would need for any package to become law. Trump endorsed opponents of two senators who faced stiff primary challenges and ultimately lost – Senator Bill Cassidy Louisiana and John Cornyn From Texas.
Cassidy has already shown more willingness to defeat the President. Fresh from it Initial lossLast week, he voted in favor of a bill seeking to force Trump to withdraw from it Hostilities with Iran.
Lawmakers said they could amend and revive some proposals that were not approved by the Senate parliamentarian for inclusion in last year’s reconciliation bill. For example, Republicans have tried to prevent states from providing medical coverage to immigrants who are in the United States illegally.
Rep. August Pfluger of Texas, chairman of the Republican Study Committee, said the bill should rest on three pillars, making the country safer and more affordable while reducing fraud.
Among the group’s recommendations is a proposal to eliminate the capital gains tax imposed on home sales to first-time homebuyers, which they say would stimulate the market, and a proposal to impose a 5% tax on money sent by non-citizens to their home countries.
Arrington said he would also like to tighten the rules for the earned income tax credit, a program that increases financial reward for work but also has a high rate of improper payments. He also called for preventing immigrants who are in the United States illegally from living in housing units financed through a housing tax credit paid to developers who build and rehabilitate affordable housing for renters.
“There’s a lot of work to be done to build on what we did in the first project with Medicaid and SNAP (food assistance), as it relates to fraud,” Arrington said.
___
Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Stephen Groves contributed to this report.