Washington – I asked the Trump administration on Friday supreme court For emergency command, allowing him to strip legal protection from more than 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants.
The Ministry of Justice asked the Supreme Court to issue a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that the administration had ended the temporary protest of the Venezuelan.
The San Francisco Federal Appeal Court rejected that the ruling issued by the American boycott judge, Edward Chen, was suspended while the case will continue.
In May, the Supreme Court reflected a preliminary order of Chen, which affected 350,000 Venezuelan, whose protection ended in April. The Supreme Court did not provide any explanation at the time, which is common in the resumption of emergency.
Public Prosecutor, Dr. John Sawir in the new court file that the judges’ order must also apply to the current case.
“This case is familiar to the court and includes an increasingly familiar phenomenon and cannot be defended by the lower courts that ignore the orders of this court on the emergency schedule,” Sawir wrote.
He said that the result is that “the new system, just like the old product, stopped the vacant and ended TPS, which affects more than 300,000 foreigners on the basis of legal theories without merit.”
The administration of President Donald Trump has moved strongly to the withdrawal of the various protection that allowed migrants to stay in the country, including ending TPS for a total of 600,000 Venezuelali and 500,000 Haitians who were granted protection during Joe Biden. TPS is given for 18 months.
The Congress was established in 1990 to prevent deportations to countries with natural disasters, civil conflict, or other dangerous conditions. The appointment can be granted the Minister of Internal Security.
Chen found that the Ministry of Internal Security acted “in an unprecedented hurry and in an unprecedented way … for the prior purpose of expediting the end of the TPS position in Venezuela.
In refusing to resume the emergency of the administration, Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote about a three -judge’s appeal committee, which decided that DHS had taken “her decisions first and searched for a valid basis for these second decisions.”