Washington– The Social Security Administration’s internal oversight body is investigating a whistleblower complaint in what it describes as a precedent Government Efficiency Department Potential worker abuse Data obtained from the Social Security Administration.
According to a document obtained by The Associated Press on Wednesday, the SSA inspector general informed the leadership of four congressional committees that it would begin the investigation after receiving an anonymous complaint.
A former DOGE software engineer has told several co-workers that he owns two highly restricted databases of American citizens’ information and has at least one data set on a thumb drive that he will share with his new employer, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
The allegations have been refuted by the agency, the former employee and the company, the SSA said.
Senate Finance Committee member Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, said in a statement that the allegations, if true, would represent “one of the largest known data breaches in American history” and called for a “full public accounting.”
The Social Security Administration maintains records for hundreds of millions of people — including health diagnoses, income, banking information, family relationships, and personal biographical data.
The agency has faced lawsuits over alleged mishandling of government data and DOGE’s access to sensitive personal information.
Last August, Detective Charles Borges, who was working as the Social Security Administration’s chief data officer, was killed Provide the disclosure to the Office of Special Counsel, noting that the Social Security data of more than 300 million Americans was compromised after DOGE officials uploaded sensitive information to an unsupervised cloud account.
In January, The Trump administration admitted in court That DOGE workers had unauthorized access to sensitive SSA data, shared SSA data using an unapproved third-party service, and engaged in activities outside the scope of SSA’s mission, including signing a “voter data agreement” with a political advocacy group.
This litigation is ongoing.