Judge Clarence Thomas is finding increasingly creative ways to justify the remodeling of long data laws.
During a rare appearance at the Columbus Law Faculty of the Catholic University in Washington, DC, on Thursday, the justice designated by George Hw Bush said the Supreme Court should adopt a more critical approach to the established precedent, arguing that the determined cases are not “the Gospel,” ABC News said.
Thomas, 77, compared his colleagues from the Supreme Court with the passengers on a train, and said: “We are never in front to see who drives the train, where it is going. And you could go there in the machine room, find that it is an orangutan who drives the train, but you want to follow that just because it is a train.”
He reasoned that some precedents were simply “something that someone dreamed and others accompanied him.”
“At some point we must think about what we are doing with Stare Decisis,” said Thomas, referring to the legal principle of fulfilling the precedent. “And it is not a kind of talisman treatment in which you can say ‘look decisis’ and not think, turn off the brain, right?”
Judge Clarence Thomas was sworn as associate judge of the United States Supreme Court on October 18, 1991. / Mark Reinstein / Getty Images
Thomas, the most important conservator of the court, made his comments of power of power only a few days before the Supreme Court begins his new term.
Perhaps the most notable, the court will consider whether to assume a challenging case Obergefell v. HodgesThe historical decision of 2015 that legalized same -sex marriage throughout the country.
Justices of the United States Supreme Court Samuel Alito, Jr., Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh, and the president of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, in the second inauguration of President Donald Trump. / Somodevilla / Pool / AFP chip through Getty Images
The file also includes an opinion of 1935 that complicates the frequent layers of power of President Donald Trump, public sentences in football games and an appeal on race and the redistribution of districts that, if annulled, would gartain a key provision of the Voting Rights Law.
Thomas also used a strange metaphor to launch insults to his courts in the court to follow the precedent, ABC reported.
“I don’t think I have the Gospel,” he added, “that any of these cases that have been decided are the Gospel, and I do give perspective to the precedent. But it should, the precedent must be respectful of our legal tradition, our country, and our laws, and be based on something, not just something dream and others went with.”
Thomas has been anxious to visit some of the most emblematic decisions of the Supreme Court, especially now that the court has a conservative majority of six to three.
Justices of the United States Supreme Court Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, President of Justice John Roberts, Jr., Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan Pose for a group portrait in Washington, on October 7, 2022.
However, the Superior Court under the president of the Supreme Court John Roberts, on average, has been less willing to turn the decisions beyond the previous courts, according to a 2024 analysis of The New York Times.
That said, the precedents that have It has often been reviewed has involved high profile and politically loaded problems: abortion, affirmative action and government regulation.
These decisions have not thrown into the court in a favorable light.
Half of the Americans have an unfavorable vision of the Supreme Court in an almost historical minimum, according to a September 3 report of the PEW Research Center.
Much of that is attributed to the 2022 decision of the Costume Court Roe v. Wadewhich established constitutional right to abortion.
This story has been updated to clarify which pres. Bush nominated Thomas.
1
(Tagstotranslate) Judge Clarence Thomas (T) Supreme Court
Source link