A Florida homeowner says a $100,000 vandalism insurance claim was denied despite coverage. And the new state law is hindering their fight.

A Florida homeowner says a 0,000 vandalism insurance claim was denied despite coverage. And the new state law is hindering their fight.
A Florida homeowner says a 0,000 vandalism insurance claim was denied despite coverage. And the new state law is hindering their fight.

A Spring Hill, Florida, resident is dealing with a state-backed insurer after his insurance claim was denied for nearly six figures.

Tom Luby told WFTS Tampa Bay 28 that Citizens Insurance twice denied his vandalism claim of nearly $100,000 at a rental property he owned. According to WFTS, the insurer said the extensive damage was due to “incomplete remodeling” of the home by the tenant, and not vandalism (1).

Property damage includes stolen and destroyed appliances, smashed floors and debris scattered inside and outside.

But under Florida’s insurance reform laws, Luby can’t take the insurance company to court. Because the company has rejected his claim twice, Luby says, he is now forced to mediate. He also said he had taken his case to three different lawyers and they all rejected him.

“They don’t want to accept it because you can’t win,” Luby said. “There’s nothing I can do.”

Critics are sounding the alarm about the new mediation process, in which claims against the insurer are routed to arbitration through the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH), rather than being heard in Florida circuit courts.

According to a recent ProPublica investigation, lawmakers and Citizens said this change, approved in 2023, would speed up hearings and save money (2). The report notes that “some DOAH judges have denied motions requesting that they disclose any potential conflicts they may have as arbitrators.”

According to WFTS, Miami-based attorney Anthony Lopez, who represents Luby in the mediation, questioned the neutrality of the DOAH judges.

“The neutral arbitrators, the DOAH judges, are basically hand-picked by Citizens. Many of them are former defense attorneys who represented insurance companies,” Lopez said.

The ProPublica report found that in the more than 1,500 disputes that Ciudadanos has taken to mandatory arbitration, it won more than 90% of the final hearings. By comparison, the insurer won 55% of the time cases went to trial in circuit courts over the past five years.

The research also presented a disconcerting trend: Homeowners who try to drop their cases are unable to do so. DOAH rules are such that a case cannot be dismissed unless both parties agree. According to ProPublica, Citizens “routinely charges fees and costs to people who do not withdraw their claim in the early stages of the DOAH process.” A lawyer interviewed in the report characterizes the actions as “vindictive.”

Source link