Washington– The Trump administration is moving forward with its plans Expel some non-profit organizations From the popular student loan forgiveness program if their work is deemed to have a “substantial illegal purpose” — a move that could prevent some teachers, doctors and other public sector workers from canceling federal loans.
New rules finalized Thursday give the Education Department expanded authority to ban organizations from the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. The Trump administration believes it is necessary to withhold taxpayer money from lawbreakers. Critics say it turns the program into a tool Political revenge.
The policy is scheduled to take effect in July, and primarily targets organizations working with immigrants and transgender youth.
The law gives the Minister of Education the authority to exclude groups from the program if they engage in activities including trafficking or “chemical castration” of children, illegal immigration and support for terrorist organizations. “Chemical castration” is defined as the use of hormone therapy or medications that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common among transgender children or teens.
It amounts to a major reworking of a program that canceled loans for over 1 million Americans It was created by Congress in 2007 to funnel more college graduates into lower-wage public sector jobs. The Trump administration has not yet identified specific groups it intends to target, but estimates that fewer than 10 will be banned annually.
“Illegal activity is by its very nature inconsistent with the public interest,” the Education Department wrote in a fact sheet. “Congress is focused on public service, and the Trump administration will not direct taxpayer dollars from hardworking Americans to organizations that violate the law.”
The program promises to cancel federal student loans for government employees and many nonprofit workers after 10 years of payments. It has long been open to government workers, teachers, firefighters and public hospital employees. Eligibility rules established by Congress mostly focus on the tax status of nonprofits and their field of operation.
The benefit has gone to workers in organizations across the political spectrum. After in a March work President Donald Trump, who is demanding new limits, said they “misdirect tax dollars to activist organizations that not only fail to serve the public interest, but actually harm our national security and American values, sometimes through criminal means.”
One of the main concerns of critics is the wide latitude the department gives itself in determining whether an organization’s work should be deemed to have a “substantial unlawful purpose.”
Employers across state and local governments as well as nonprofits can be kicked out of the program if a state or federal court rules against them or if they agree to a legal settlement that includes pleading guilty. It appears that providing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that ban it, for example, could be grounds for eviction.
Even without a legal outcome, the Minister of Education will be able to decide independently whether an organization should be banned. The Secretary will consider whether the “preponderance of the evidence” leans against the employer.
In completing the rule, the administration dismissed the concerns of many who said the level of evidence was too low.
“It ensures that decisions are based on reality, not speculation, and allows the Department to act quickly to protect both borrowers and taxpayers,” federal officials wrote.
Opponents of this proposal include prominent associations in the fields of higher education, health care and the legal professions. In public comments submitted to the department, many called this overreach illegal and said it would undermine an incentive that has helped address labor shortages in high-demand areas.
The American Bar Association said it could thin the ranks of public defenders and public interest law practitioners. The association said thousands of people would lose access to representation, “simply because the positions of these lawyers were deemed politically unfavorable by the minister.”
The National Council of Nonprofits said the policy would allow future administrations from any political party to change eligibility rules “based on their priorities or ideology.”
Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., chairman of the House Education and Workforce Committee, said the overhaul would prevent taxpayers from covering loan forgiveness for employees of “extremist organizations that violate state and federal laws.” “Aiding illegal immigration, supporting terrorism, or promoting child abuse through gender transitions is not a public service,” Wahlberg said in a statement.
According to the new rules, employers can only be penalized for activities that take place on or after July 1, 2026. They will be notified and given an opportunity to review the evidence and respond to the Department’s findings. Those barred from the program can reapply for eligibility after 10 years or rejoin sooner if they follow a “corrective action plan” approved by the secretary.
Documents released by the department indicate that a single violation of the law may or may not be enough to prevent an employer from operating, depending on the circumstances. The agency said that not all organizations violating the law have a “significant illegal purpose,” and it is ultimately up to the minister’s analysis of the evidence.
___
AP’s education coverage receives financial support from several private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Search for access points Standards To work with charities, a existing From supporters and sponsored coverage areas at AP.org.