Dr Eric Leire, CEO of Genflow Biosciences Ltd (LSE:GENF, OTCQB:GENFF, FRA:WQ5), spoke to Proactive about the company’s latest RNS regarding its upcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM) and the strategic rationale behind authorizing the potential share issue ahead of clinical partnership discussions.
Leire addressed potential shareholder concerns and acknowledged that announcements related to share issuance can sometimes be interpreted as a fundraising signal. However, he clarified that the RNS is not about launching a capital increase, but rather about strengthening the company’s position in current and future negotiations with the main pharmaceutical partners.
He explained that in biotechnology, financial flexibility directly translates into leverage. “In biotechnology, cash is not just money, it is bargaining power,” Leire said. As a public company, Genflow Biosciences Ltd’s financial position is visible to potential partners, and Leire emphasized the importance of maintaining the ability to walk away from unfavorable conditions.
He added that the company is not committed to using the full 30% share issuance authority and noted that the underlying science remains unchanged. “Our science hasn’t changed. What we’re doing is just making sure we capture the full value of our science,” he said.
While acknowledging that markets do not like uncertainty, Leire stated that uncertainty is temporary, while signing a bad deal would have long-lasting consequences. He said the company is focused on optimizing for the best long-term outcome and ensuring it is not forced into a suboptimal deal.
Proactive: Eric very good to talk to you. You issued an RNS this morning noting your upcoming Annual General Meeting, and also talking about discussions with partners. Can you tell us more about that?
Dr. Éric Leire: We fully understand that shareholders may be frustrated by the RNS we issued today. We don’t take it lightly. This RNS is about the Annual General Meeting, but may be perceived as a possible capital increase. Normally, we know that the share price declines when a capital increase is announced and then recovers when the strategic benefit becomes evident. We’ve seen that pattern repeatedly. So if we knew the stock price could go down, why did we create this RNS? The answer is simple. This is not an RNS about a possible fundraiser. It’s about bargaining power. What we are doing is proactively strengthening our position before entering into conversations about clinical partnerships.
Proactive: You say these are talks about partnerships, but do you think the RNS could still be perceived as an announcement about a fundraiser?