Washington– A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from implementing a presidential memorandum issued in March to revoke the security clearance of a prominent Washington lawyer. Mark ZedIt ruled that the order – which also targeted 14 other people – could not be applied to him.
The decision marked the administration’s second legal setback on Tuesday, after the Supreme Court refused to allow Trump to deploy National Guard troops to the Chicago area, capping a first year in office where President Donald Trump has made efforts to impose a sweeping agenda and tough policies. Follow up on retribution The pace of trials against political opponents has been repeatedly slowed by the courts.
US District Court Judge Amir Ali in Washington granted Zaid’s request for a preliminary injunction, after he filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration last May over the cancellation of his security clearance. Zaid’s request described this as an act of “improper political retaliation” that jeopardizes his ability to continue representing his clients in sensitive national security cases.
The March presidential memorandum singled out Zaid and 14 other individuals who the White House asserted were ineligible to retain their clearances because doing so was “no longer in the national interest.” The list included targets that angered Trump from the political and legal fields, including the former Deputy District Attorney Lisa Monaco, New York Attorney General Letitia JamesAnd former President Joe Biden and his family members.
The action was part of a A much broader campaign of revenge Which Trump has launched since his return to the White House, including directing specific Justice Department investigations against his perceived opponents and issuing sweeping executive orders targeting law firms over legal work he doesn’t like.
In AugustThe Trump administration said it has revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials. Order to cancel The clearances were a favored retaliation tactic that Trump used — or at least attempted to do — against prominent political figures, lawyers and intelligence officials in his second term.
Zaid said in his lawsuit that he has represented clients from across the political spectrum for nearly 35 years, including government officials, law enforcement officials, military officials and whistleblowers. In 2019, he represented an intelligence community whistleblower whose account of a conversation they had Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky It helped pave the way for the first two impeachment cases against Trump in his first term.
“This court joins many other courts in this region that have prevented the government from using arbitrary revocation of security clearances to punish lawyers who represent people who oppose it,” Ali wrote in his order.
Ali stressed that his order does not prevent the government from revoking or suspending Zaid’s permit for reasons independent of the presidential memorandum and through normal agency procedures. The preliminary injunction will not take effect until January 13.
“This is not just a victory for me, it is a condemnation of the Trump administration’s attempts to intimidate and silence the legal community, especially lawyers who represent people who dare to question or hold this government accountable,” Zeid said in a statement.
___
Associated Press reporter Eric Tucker contributed to this report.