San Jose, California – San Jose, California (AP)-Eleven of the pro-Palestinian demonstrators who were arrested at Stanford University approved last year after they occupied the president’s office building that he was not guilty on Monday for the second time after being accused by a major jury on charges of sabotaging a felony.
A group of current and former students and activists They were accused in April With a crime sabotage and a felony conspiracy to infringement. Everyone acknowledged that they were not guilty during their trial the following month.
Jeff Rosen’s lawyer, Jeff Rosen, said in the court’s documents, after delaying the initial hearing for several months due to the lack of defense lawyer.
The accusation regulations of the Grand jury last week replaced the charges against April, which allowed legal procedures to overcome the initial listening sessions, which are kept to determine whether there is sufficient evidence for trial.
Rosen wrote: “People are ready for trial as soon as possible.”
Defense lawyer Jeff Fawznak said that the group’s lawyers had requested a preliminary hearing and put an appointment on November 3, which would have given them the opportunity to defy the evidence provided publicly.
Fawznak said: “The major jury bodies are secret procedures in which the defendants or defense lawyers are not present to ask questions or defend themselves.” “By avoiding a preliminary hearing, they secretly make an important step in the case.”
On Monday, a judge set a trial on November 17.
Stanford The acquisition began at dawn on June 5, 2024The last day of the spring semesters at the Silicon Valley in California. Some demonstrators stole them inside the building, which includes the university president’s office. Others connect weapons abroad, Stanford daily I mentioned at that time. The group chanted, “Palestine will be free, and we will liberate Palestine.” The acquisition ended three hours after they were arrested.
The authorities arrested 12 people, but last month, a 21 -year -old man who does not care about any competition under a postponed agreement for the referee’s agreement available to young defendants. If he continues observation without any other legal problem, the case can be rejected, Mercury news said. The man witnessed the prosecution before the Grand jury.
Representatives of the prosecution accuse the demonstrators of photographing spraying in the building, breaking windows and furniture, and disrupting security cameras and a red liquid spray described by false blood on things throughout the building. The damage was estimated at hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to public prosecutors.