As insurers search for performance in an era of capital pressure and volatile markets, many have outsourced large parts of their balance sheets to specialist asset managers who promise sophistication, diversification and access to complex credit.
The argument is familiar: insurers focus on underwriting, while third-party managers generate returns through insurance-linked securities, private credit and bespoke structures. But a growing number of failures suggests a big risk that this model is still not well understood. When insurers outsource asset management, they also outsource judgment.
The recent history of Leadenhall Capital Partners offers a sobering case study. Founded in 2008, London-based Leadenhall positions itself as a specialist in insurance-linked investments, spanning catastrophe bonds, collateralized reinsurance, life and health risk transfer, and insurance-adjacent private credit. The firm operates as a joint venture connected to Japanese insurance group MS&AD, with regulatory registrations in the UK, US and Bermuda.
On paper, Leadenhall looks like an ideal outsourced partner for insurers: sector focus, regulatory oversight and roughly $4 billion to $5 billion in assets under management.
However, in a number of high-profile situations (Friday Health Plans, Health IQ, Reverse Mortgage Investment Trust, and ongoing litigation involving 777 Partners and A-CAP) a consistent pattern emerges: aggressive deployment of capital into complex or regulated businesses, followed by slow recognition of difficulties, litigation-heavy responses, and substantial erosion of value.
Friday Health Plans was once hailed as a fast-growing disruptor in the Affordable Care Act market. Between 2021 and 2022, the insurer expanded rapidly across multiple states, raising hundreds of millions of dollars and projecting nearly $2 billion in annual premium revenue.
Leadenhall provided debt financing, led subsequent financing rounds and publicly supported Friday’s management and growth strategy. But by the end of 2022, the warning signs were hard to miss. On Friday it began leaving states, laying off employees and drawing greater scrutiny from insurance regulators.
In 2023, the collapse accelerated. Texas entered liquidation on Friday. Georgia declared him insolvent. Oklahoma imposed regulatory oversight. By mid-year, the company had laid off its staff and transferred assets for liquidation. Court documents later revealed that Friday was so exhausted that he was struggling to maintain legal representation in post-collapse litigation.
For insurers, the lesson was stark: Repeated injections of capital did not prevent failure in a tightly regulated business where execution errors compound quickly. Growth capital, even from insurance-focused investors, is no substitute for operational discipline.
Health IQ followed a different trajectory but came to a similar end. Once valued at approximately $450 million and backed by prominent venture investors, the insurance brokerage pivoted repeatedly (from life insurance to Medicare sales) while relying heavily on commission income and aggressive telemarketing.
In December 2022, Health IQ conducted mass layoffs, prompting litigation under the WARN Act. In 2023, the company declared bankruptcy and its liabilities far exceeded its assets. Creditors refused to support a Chapter 11 restructuring and Health IQ went straight into liquidation.
Media coverage detailed unpaid suppliers, dozens of lawsuits and millions siphoned through subsidiaries before the collapse. The intellectual property was distributed among secured creditors, leaving employees and counterparties with limited recovery. What caught the attention of restructuring professionals was not only the magnitude of the failure, but the absence of a viable turnaround effort despite months of negotiations and escalating professional fees.
RMIT filed for Chapter 11 at the end of 2022, citing rising interest rates and liquidity pressure. Over the next year, bankruptcy court records showed repeated disputes over debtor-in-possession financing, administrative claims, and creditor priority. While the estate was burning millions of dollars a month in professional fees, resolution was grinding to a halt. The judges ultimately approved a liquidation that gave priority to the largest creditors, while smaller disputes persisted well beyond their economic relevance.
For insurers watching closely, the case highlighted a critical risk: Private credit tied to insurance-adjacent assets can quickly become legally and operationally confusing, with outcomes driven as much by litigation posture as economics.
Leadenhall’s profile rose sharply in 2024 with its federal lawsuit in New York against 777 Partners and A-CAP, alleging fraud, breach of contract and improper promise of warranty. The dispute involves Premier League Everton Football Club, where 777 was the owner, and Leadenhall alleges 777 breached court orders relating to the assets, complicating the sale of the football club.
Courts granted temporary restraining orders to freeze assets tied to what Leadenhall claimed was more than $600 million in accelerated debt. Trade publications noted that judges allowed discovery to proceed, indicating the seriousness of the allegations.
Leadenhall did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CorpGov.
Regardless of the outcome, the episode underscores a central concern of insurers: making loans against opaque collateral funds where documentation, control rights and enforcement are existential, not technicalities.
Individually, each episode can be dismissed as bad luck or upheaval in a specific sector. Taken together, they reveal a consistent profile: capital deployed into complex, regulated or opaque insurance-adjacent businesses, followed by a delayed course correction and litigation-heavy resolution.
This is important because insurance capital is not risk capital. Supports regulated liabilities and public trust. As the Leadenhall saga shows, when external managers misjudge risk or mismanage difficulties, the consequences flow directly to insurers, policyholders and regulators.
READ MORE
‘Principal’ Governance: Jessica McDougall, President of Longacre Square Partners, Live on NYSE
Sign up for our weekly newsletter HERE
Contact:
CorpGov.com
Editor@CorpGov.com
Click HERE to follow us on LinkedIn
The post When insurers outsourced risk to Leadenhall, they inherited managers’ failings appeared first on CorpGov.
