Boeing, Orsted, Kenvue, Google: trend actions

00:09 Speaker a

It is time for today’s trend. Well, let’s start with a great headline this morning. Boeing is receiving an elevator after climbing the center of the stage in the Us-China negotiations. The shares are in the previous market now. Let’s take a quick look at that graphic. That is, more than 2%. That is after the United States ambassador to China, David Perdue said the two countries were in advanced negotiations for a big problem to buy Boeing airplanes. Bloomberg has reported that the order could involve up to 500 aircraft, which would be the first important Chinese sale of Boeing from before the pandemic. The American aircraft manufacturer has lost land to its European rival Airbus in recent years.

01:03 Speaker a

Orsted is then gathering after a federal judge raised the prohibition of the Trump administration of his massive Rhode Island wind project. And the actions of the Danish wind company listed in Copenhagen, which have been in free fall in recent weeks, fired in more than 12% at one point and are now in more than 4% higher. The offshore wind farm is complete at 80%, so this is a great relief for investors concerned that Orsted loses several billions of dollars if the project was canceled.

01:38 Speaker a

Now, there is another renewable energy action that must see today. Power plug. The actions of the hydrogen cell fuel manufacturer continue their remarkable race after flying 21.6% in regular trade. The action is adding another 20, Whoa, another large amount in the previous market. This has a lot to do with artificial intelligence. Investors are analyzing the potential of hydrogen storage in data centers that will have high energy energy needs.

02:22 Speaker a

In medical care now. And Tylenol manufacturer Kenvue is recovering from a strong sale after President Trump’s statement that links Tylenol with autism and ADHD. The actions that are quoted in the Kenvue list in New York won around 6% after the hours, since many doctors rejected Trump’s claim and Kenvue reiterated that there is no scientific evidence that Tylenol causes autism when they take pregnant women.

02:59 Speaker a

Finally, Alphabet is trying to avoid the rupture of his advertising technology business in a new antimonopoly trial that threatens to fly his business. The former president of the FTC, William Kovacic, spoke with thousands of Yahoo Finance about what is at stake.

03:19 William Kovacic

Therefore, this case approach is in Adtech in its advertising services, the exchange of advertisements and the operation of the exchange of ads. Therefore, this case seeks UH in the opinion of the Department of Justice to loosen Google’s control over this critical element of the advertising battery and give UH editors and advertisers more freedom to choose alternative strategies to deal with each other.

04:00 Udland miles

Now, I am curious in your opinion based on the ruling that we obtained last month, um how this may impact as you know, the government’s case entering, the government’s thinking around the case, the case of Google entering. As there is a relationship here, UM, you know, in your opinion of how the company and the government can approach these procedures that were given what you saw, you know, at the end of August of August.

04:31 William Kovacic

We can be sure that the judge in the Adtech case is going to study, he has studied that previous decision very carefully. Both to analyze the framework that the target judge used in the case of search and to evaluate how it could be applied in their own circumstances. So that will be a very informative framework. The key difference is that the case of Judge Brinkema that involves Adtech involved different facts, somewhat different arguments, and has a considerable discretion to decide how that legal framework will apply. Therefore, the lighter tactile treatment that Google received in the case of search not necessarily predetermines a similar result in the case of Remedios in Adtech.

05:31 Udland miles

Now, however, I am curious, we have seen that, let’s say the environment towards the antimonopoly, the enthusiasm that some corners of government have about to enforce certain statutes or, you know, interpret them in certain ways, it has changed in time since this case was brought for the first time and then we really go to trial. How, you know, how each side, how they think anywhere about that in the period prior to a procedure that is, you know, this type of high profile, especially around a company like this with the potential, you know, remedies that I think could be thought of depending on how the judge breaks?

06:21 William Kovacic

An area of ​​continuity that we have seen in the Biden and Trump administrations is a commitment to pursue these great technological cases. The leadership of the Department of Justice has been emphatic in saying that its approach is at full speed, that the broader objective of structural relief, which would imply some element of a divestment, is still in front and center in its corrective objectives, so that the Trump administration and the Biden administration, although they do not like to say that they have much in common, seem to have a common cause in this case.